Ending Avon’s Flock Contracts Responsibly
Protecting personal privacy while respecting public safety and taxpayer dollars.
The September 11 edition of the Vail Daily includes an article asking all seven Avon Town Council candidates where they stand on the town’s Flock license-plate-reading cameras.
My position is clear: I believe Avon should end its Flock contracts, but do so responsibly.
The Town Council should review the contracts and terminate them when the town can do so without incurring a financial penalty. This approach respects taxpayer dollars while responding to legitimate concerns about privacy, outside access to information and strong public opposition to the system.
My position is not a criticism of the Avon Police Department. It is a nationally accredited agency deserving of our respect and support. The question is whether Flock’s information-sharing structure and privacy safeguards are appropriate for Avon.
Flock cameras should also be distinguished from Avon’s speed-enforcement cameras. I support speed-enforcement technology that addresses dangerous driving and helps protect pedestrians. Flock’s networked license-plate-reading system raises a separate set of concerns.
Public safety and personal privacy are not mutually exclusive. Avon can support effective law enforcement while ending these contracts carefully and without imposing an unnecessary financial cost on the town.
Read the Vail Daily article comparing all seven candidates’ positions on Flock cameras.